Personally, I have been totally gripped by contact improvisation from the moment I was introduced to it. I adore the sensation of shifting weight and the danger of the dynamic and trust the art form creates between two people. The dance form appeals to my love of science, specifically physics. Contact Improvisation creates honest authentic dance, it brings a dancer back into their body, back into the moment, and really doesn’t allow any room for “over-doing.” My love and curiosity about contact improvisation is what lead me to suggest that Carrie and I research Steve Paxton. I quickly found out his interests are even more closely related to my own.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1CvXcDE2LpzoSzDf4MdLdgF1EanKCyOIoFGoWz1Vd5jwBlc1Pm9TEHnijTkVkMmxjJj1rwiuYPGuhXZq8T2Lt9oEdtMVBm2Y7Qdu3X6MVEGColNLO-9019arWu_GB93Tu_qqVA9AuXys/s320/material.jpg)
I really respect the accessibility of his work. His work with the disabled shows the range of his work. He has worked with the cognitively disabled, the blind, the physically handicapped, the old, the young, and even trained dancers. His work allows any person to go through an exploration of their own body, and to reignite movement in a world consumed by material. For me, it is not his specific choreography that has been his great contribution to the dance world, but rather his unique process and the explorations he has worked with such as, Material for the Spine, his work with pedestrian movement in Satisfying Lover, his creation of Contact Improvisation and the exploration of the physics between two people, and over all the benefit of movement for people from every walk of life.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEje85uLv4C57T1C-A4QPAjl59Guc7l5tq1WDw5vP1tjI0AwcTtNCJ5eLcTcIm21Pbmfy_RyUD7ExfHqMANYM2OBSwgt0MvPaAsfQ2Gn_-XE5fM5QDetlYFgCOW5dkZpT-4rTkmiB0Pigqo/s400/Photo(C)Jordi+Bover_9829-2.jpg)
~Rachel